��ɫ��Ƶ

The competition requires students to take a decisive stance on the following prompt, explored in an essay of 800-1,000 words: 

Vinchon and colleagues (2023) argue that “…AI can act as a powerful support tool, accelerating the creative process and providing new perspectives. But it is also a reminder that despite its capabilities, AI is not an independent creator, but rather a collaborative creative agent.”&�Բ�����;

Others firmly believe that "AI poses an existential threat to the livelihoods and thus work of an entire class of professional creatives due to its ability to produce work of a sufficient technical standard to achieve these instrumental goals at a lower cost" (Wade, 2024). 

However, Ehrhardt (2025) acknowledges that AI "can simulate sadness but never really suffer," and thus will never replace human creativity that stems from deep feelings and emotions.

Respond to this prompt:

Is AI a threat to human creativity?

Are artists and creatives being empowered or undermined by AI tools? Can something generated by AI be considered original?

Sources:

Feel free to find additional sources. 

General rules

   1. Entries must be 800 – 1,000 words long, typed and written in English.

   2. The deadline for receipt of all entries is Friday, February 27, 2026, at 5:00 pm.

   3. Entries cannot have been previously published.

   4. No more than one entry per student will be permitted.

   5. Only entries written by secondary school students currently in Transition Year or 5th Year will be considered. These students must be from schools within Ireland.

Instructions for submission

Please, e-mail an electronic copy of your submission to writingcentre@ul.ie

Please, mention the words “essay competition” in the subject line of your e-mail.

Please, note that no indication of your identity should appear on the pages of the electronic copy of your essay. 

Along with the electronic copy of your essay, please attach a completed identification sheet which can be downloaded below. It is important that if you are shortlisted we are able to contact you.

Essay writing criteria

The competition requires students to take a decisive stance about a prompt in an essay of 800-1,000 words: 

The criteria on which judgement is based are found below. The adjudicators’ verdicts are final, and no correspondence shall be entered into regarding individual competition entries. Only winners will be notified.

The Regional Writing Centre reserves the right to publish winning entries on our website. The shortlisted winners will be sent a Media Release Form by e-mail, giving us permission to do so. 

Winners will be announced on Friday, April 10, 2026, and prizes will be presented at an awards ceremony at the ��ɫ��Ƶ on Thursday, May 21, 2026.

The overall winner of this National competition will receive a high-end Android tablet, while the two runners-up will receive a €100 One4All voucher each. 

Criteria for Evaluating Winning Essays

1. The writer approaches the prompt from a unique perspective

• The writer addresses the prompt.
• The writer outlines some relevant issues and takes a stance on the issues outlined.
• The writer’s position might be unique, perhaps risky, but...
• …the writer makes a compelling case for that position, using valid and reliable evidence to support the position taken.

2. Well-organised argument

• There is a logical progression of ideas (argumentative/conceptual framework) that supports the position taken.
• There is a clear and consistent focus on the issues raised by the prompt/question.
• There is an absence of irrelevant or extraneous material and repetition. 

3. Appeals are compelling

• Appeals are made to an educated general audience.
• Appeals are made to readers’ sense of reason, but appeals to other senses are also entertained, such as the readers’ sense of what is just, outrageous or immoral. (However, the writer shouldn’t assume that the readership is of one mind about what is moral or just or reasonable.)

4. The position taken and the claims made are well-supported

• The writer demonstrates a capacity to consistently relate relevant material (newspaper articles, studies, books, interviews, etc. that are in the public domain) to the argumentative framework. 

5. The writer is respectful of alternative positions

• The defence accounts for alternate views, but provides a compelling rebuttal in support of the writer’s own position.

6. Grammatically and mechanically sound

• The written style (grammar, spelling, punctuation and sentence construction) does not inhibit the reader’s understanding of the argument or its claims, the support offered to justify the claims or any other warrants or grounds that justify the claims and the conclusions.

7.  First place is distinguished from the runners-up by:

• The degree to which a persuasive original argument has been developed.
• The depth and sophistication of the argument’s framework.
• The level of familiarity with/understanding of relevant social issues and implications